Posts Tagged ‘matrimonial home’

Preservation through the generations

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

Last Cawthra Feather SolicitorsWith mortgages so hard to come by parents increasingly provide financial support to their children as they enter adulthood.   Most commonly this is done by parents in anticipation of the marriage of a child to assist in the purchase of their child’s and their intended’s new matrimonial home.

It’s a loving gesture and no one wants to assume the worst but it is a reality that relationships do break down.  Rachel Spencer Robb, Family Law Solicitor at awarding winning law firm Last Cawthra Feather looks into at this increasingly common issue.

With nothing in writing setting out what the position should be the funds derived from the hard work of parents will be pooled with all other assets of their divorcing child and their spouse.

What steps have been taken to protect the funds against a potential claim in divorce proceedings or claim from a cohabitee?   Is it the case that funds were truly gifted with no recourse if the relationship breaks down?   Or is it that parents would prefer some protection against the claim that a spouse or partner might have over their child’s ‘inheritance’?

So, what should be done?

Rachel advises “Consideration should be given at the outset as to whether the funds are to be a loan or a gift.  If funds are to be loaned, there should be an agreement in writing”

“The more formal the loan agreement (or indeed any document between family members) the more it is likely to have weight in the Court and be less open to criticism as a “soft loan” and not one that should be repaid” Rachel adds.

Even if funds are to be given, parents may want to protect those funds for their own child against any potential claim.  The money can be placed in trust for the benefit of their child but with certain terms that the money (or what is left) reverts to the parent in specific circumstances.

Rachel goes on to say “There is no such thing as a “common law” spouse and therefore any breakdown of an unmarried relationship is subject to trust law, property law and what each of the parties remembered about who said what to whom about the interest in the property they purchased together. Not usually the stuff of romantic chats by the fire!”

“It is always preferable to seek legal advice about cohabitation and pre-nuptial agreements to ensure that control is kept over family wealth, particularly where it is being handed down through generations.    You work hard to get to a level of comfortable living and want your children to do the same.  Make sure that all steps are taken to clarify what you want to happen both in life and death to preserve wealth for your family.” she concludes

Rachel Spencer Robb is a Family Law Solicitor at LCF’s Ilkley Office. Rachel has 12 years experience in specialising in family law, advising mid to high net worth clients in any legal aspect of their family relationships. Rachel is an accredited specialist of Resolution

For further information on the above issues please visit www.lcf.co.uk or alternatively contact Rachel on 01274 848800  or via email enquiries@lcf.co.uk

The matrimonial home and bankruptcy

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

Cohen Cramer Solicitors LeedsThe bankruptcy of a spouse can have a catastrophic effect upon the ancillary relief claims of the other spouse.  In this article, it is assumed that it is the husband who is made the subject of a bankruptcy order, and we examine the effect upon the wife’s ancillary relief claim.  However, the same would apply if it were the wife’s bankruptcy and the husband was seeking ancillary relief.

Where there is a possibility that a husband could be made bankrupt, the advice to the wife is to try to reach an early settlement of ancillary relief proceedings and to effect any transfer of property before bankruptcy.  Even if the transfer has not been put into place by the time the husband is made bankrupt, as long as decree absolute has been pronounced and the time limit under the Order for the husband to transfer the property has expired, the property will belong to the wife.  However, if the bankruptcy petition against the husband had been issued before the ancillary relief order had been made then under Section 284 of the Insolvency Act 1986, any disposition by a person later made bankrupt made after the issue of a bankruptcy petition is void.

The wife is therefore safe if an ancillary relief order has been made and a transfer of the property pursuant to a court order has taken effect.  The exception to this would be if there was any collusion, fraud or material non-disclosure by the wife.  In such cases, a trustee in bankruptcy may be entitled to have the ancillary relief order and transfer set aside.  Any settlement must therefore be a genuine resolution of ancillary relief claims.

What would happen if the ancillary relief order provided for the former matrimonial home to remain in joint names but subject to a later sale?  This situation could arise where it had been agreed or the wife had been allowed to remain in the matrimonial home for as long as she liked unless she re-married.  Unfortunately for the wife in this situation, a trustee in bankruptcy can apply to Court for an order that the property be sold unless there are exceptional circumstances.  If the home had been transferred into the wife’s sole name with the charge back in the husband’s favour the trustee would struggle to enforce this charge before the events triggering sale as specified in the charge.

Where the trustee has an interest in a property which used to be the matrimonial home, the trustee has 3 years from the date of the bankruptcy order to take steps to realize his interest.  If a trustee doesn’t take steps within this time frame then his interest reverts back to the bankrupt.

For further information, contact  Cohen Cramer Solicitors family law department here or for further information, contact Cohen Cramer Solicitors on 0113 244 0597 or visit www.cohencramer.co.uk